![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Talk Review: "Unlikely Utopia"
The author of Unlikely Utopia: the Surprising Triumph of Canadian Pluralism spoke here last night.
[...and I'll fill in the details later.]
[and I suck. I didn't get to this until today, Sunday the 18th, and I barely remember any of the talk's details.]
Michael Adams is an engaging speaker (as well as a good writer, judging by Fire and Ice.
The point to the talk was that pluralism has been successful in Canada in the second half of the 20th century in a very different way from in the US or Europe; and it has been surprisingly successful at integrating immigrants in important ways. Case in point: you might judge first-generation Canadian integration by their civic involvement- as a measure of how strongly people feel connected to their new communities.
Measuring foreign-born members of Parliament is interesting- because not only do they need to *want* to run for office, they need to successfully *win* office, and the statistics usually describe highly mixed-ethnicity MP ridings, so they're not winning solely among their own ethnicity of voters. One example was a Toronto riding with a Chinese-Canadian MP, where the majority ethnicity is Italian.
Anyhow: 13% of MPs are foreign born; first-generation Canadian; versus roughly 20% of the population being first-generation Canadian.
Or in the United States, where 4% of the House of Representatives are foreign-born, versus something like 11% of the population are foreign-born.
This review covers a small wedge of the talk's topics. I might've taken more complete notes, but I didn't. I hope to eventually read the book, and I can review it properly then. But don't hold your breath.
[...and I'll fill in the details later.]
[and I suck. I didn't get to this until today, Sunday the 18th, and I barely remember any of the talk's details.]
Michael Adams is an engaging speaker (as well as a good writer, judging by Fire and Ice.
The point to the talk was that pluralism has been successful in Canada in the second half of the 20th century in a very different way from in the US or Europe; and it has been surprisingly successful at integrating immigrants in important ways. Case in point: you might judge first-generation Canadian integration by their civic involvement- as a measure of how strongly people feel connected to their new communities.
Measuring foreign-born members of Parliament is interesting- because not only do they need to *want* to run for office, they need to successfully *win* office, and the statistics usually describe highly mixed-ethnicity MP ridings, so they're not winning solely among their own ethnicity of voters. One example was a Toronto riding with a Chinese-Canadian MP, where the majority ethnicity is Italian.
Anyhow: 13% of MPs are foreign born; first-generation Canadian; versus roughly 20% of the population being first-generation Canadian.
Or in the United States, where 4% of the House of Representatives are foreign-born, versus something like 11% of the population are foreign-born.
This review covers a small wedge of the talk's topics. I might've taken more complete notes, but I didn't. I hope to eventually read the book, and I can review it properly then. But don't hold your breath.
no subject
Promise?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
the talk.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Hello
(Anonymous) 2008-08-21 03:44 am (UTC)(link)