(no subject)
This afternoon I got email from Cliff Stoll.
Which isn't so weird, because I ordered a klein bottle for somebody (thanks again for the idea
mynatt). What's weird is that it's five paragraphs, with at least three personal references from my order form that suggest he hand-crafted it, or else his form-mail program is much better than any I've written.
Which isn't so weird, because I ordered a klein bottle for somebody (thanks again for the idea

klein steins rock
If I had a topologist in my life, I would totally order one. I might anyway, next time I have $80US laying around, waiting to be re-purposed.
--fishbot
Re: klein steins rock
pain to clean; and 2) the person I was buying it for, doesn't drink beer :)
no subject
no subject
My major serious disagreement with C. Stoll is that (as I recall) he's completely opposed to using computers in K-12 education. The articles I've read by him on the topic contain arguements that were (at the time, for me) more easily refutable than the ones that
no subject
no subject
I think I've read Cliff Stoll say that he thinks computers will continue to be a detriment to education, indefinitely, which is consistent with the page you pointed to where he didn't think there was any appropriate use for computers for kids.
In general, I agree that "computer literacy" as an end to itself is stupid, and computers themselves are way too expensive. But I see lots of opportunity with $300 PCs or thin-clients, (or $100 HW in a generation), that can be accomplished with today's software and well-trained teachers.
Teachers are currently doing really neat things with computers for data-collection and doing real science with the aggregate data; and the Ask Dr. Math forum (which my sweetie used to volunteer for); and other communications tasks that are made possible by computers that wouldn't be feasible otherwise. Those, I think, are encouraging about computers' current (or future, if you like) usefulness in schools...
The challenges, of course, include teachers who want nothing to do with it (and/or feel threatened by systems that don't put them at centre stage), the expense (for HW, SW, and training), and the legitimate concerns that you and Cliff (and dan and I) have about computers being seen as the shiny tool to end all tools.
In an ideal world, I'd like to be one of those folks who's bringing the computers to where they will be a generation from now (and truly useful).
I got rather burnt out from trying to do so "from the outside" (getting education grants is really tough; and demoralizing to me because it's competing against all kinds of other worthy projects...) and I've not had much success at finding a job doing this in a university setting; but with any luck, this work at the U of W will be one step in that direction.
And now you know my secr3t plan. :)
no subject
And best of luck with your secret plan!