![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto
Imagine writing software that, say, needs to be able to identify whether a photo has Elvis Presley in it. Or whether the voice in a sound-clip is angry. Or does text recognition on scrawled handwriting. Amazon has released an API to make this possible via a web-service. So, your program calls this API (using whatever inputs you want, such as a question, or a picture) and it returns a value answer within some specified time period.
Cleverly, they named it "Mechanical Turk". It does precisely the same thing as the old-time pre-robotic chess-player, which was a fake, done with a small person hidden inside the console. When I came across this, I was convinced it was a practical joke. Like Google's pigeon-ranking algorithm from 1 April 2002. But no, this seems to be legit. People post a bounty (seems typically a penny) for others to claim by performing a "Human Intelligence Task" (as opposed to an artificial intelligence task). The requester can require particular qualifications, and they have the right to refuse bad answers.
Right now most of the questions are surveys paying a penny, though there are some transcription tasks that pay approximately $10/hr. This has fairly exciting (but scary) possibilities for outsourcing work across the globe. On the one hand, it literally puts people into an inhuman job, doing work for computers. At the same time, people have done menial jobs forever; and companies have been doing similar outsourcing over the internet for a while. This just brings it down to smaller companies, or anybody with a bit of cash and a computer program.
This development doesn't surprise me much; my ex-business-partner and I wrote a similar service in 1996, which we gave up on because we didn't have the means to make it big enough to matter. But at the same time, even though it's an obvious development, it creeps me out a bit that a big company is actually doing it.
It's also funny to me that this could directly be used to countervent "are you a human" tests.
Cleverly, they named it "Mechanical Turk". It does precisely the same thing as the old-time pre-robotic chess-player, which was a fake, done with a small person hidden inside the console. When I came across this, I was convinced it was a practical joke. Like Google's pigeon-ranking algorithm from 1 April 2002. But no, this seems to be legit. People post a bounty (seems typically a penny) for others to claim by performing a "Human Intelligence Task" (as opposed to an artificial intelligence task). The requester can require particular qualifications, and they have the right to refuse bad answers.
Right now most of the questions are surveys paying a penny, though there are some transcription tasks that pay approximately $10/hr. This has fairly exciting (but scary) possibilities for outsourcing work across the globe. On the one hand, it literally puts people into an inhuman job, doing work for computers. At the same time, people have done menial jobs forever; and companies have been doing similar outsourcing over the internet for a while. This just brings it down to smaller companies, or anybody with a bit of cash and a computer program.
This development doesn't surprise me much; my ex-business-partner and I wrote a similar service in 1996, which we gave up on because we didn't have the means to make it big enough to matter. But at the same time, even though it's an obvious development, it creeps me out a bit that a big company is actually doing it.
It's also funny to me that this could directly be used to countervent "are you a human" tests.
no subject
no subject
I had a job editing voice files for phone-mail systems. So, so boring. It was incredibly repetitive. At least working for Mechanical Turk would give you a whole lot of variety...
no subject
I have this weird fascination/repulsion with repetitive tasks. Sometimes, I can really get into it, and wash close to an hour's worth of dishes thinking about nothing and feeling great at the end. Probably has something to do with my history..
I worked at my parents' farm from about age 12, packing maple-syrup into small jugs. It, too, was mind-numbing. I totally lost count of the number of different ways I re-designed the process in my head to be more efficient; though all depended on more machinery, which my dad would never buy (or let me make).
As a kid, voluntarily, I turned myself into a data-entry droid, typing in dozens of Commodore-64 programs in assembly language. I still can't believe I did so many of those.
...I enjoyed the video/audio editing work I did as a summer job at school, but that's because it was a research project and involved spoken and written Arabic, which was just super-cool.
no subject
Sure, but the thing is, the selection process is entirely voluntary, right? You don't get assigned tasks, you pick one. So it's only as much drudgery as you're willing to put up with, no?
And it opens up an interesting free market on the tasks; those that are inherently interesting will get dealt with quickly, for low cost. People who have very dull tasks will need to either pay well or put up with very long response times...
no subject
*shudder*
no subject
Maybe I'm missing something about how the API works, but it sounds like Amazon will pay anyone in the world who answers the question, so there's no need for a middle man or centralization, if you want the money, you can just DO it.
no subject
I distrust The Man enough that I woudn't be surprised at that development, though.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Eventually, AI will get good enough...
Haven't they been saying that phrase for the last 30 years? :)
In the meantime, bon-bon away.