Talk Review: "Unlikely Utopia"
Saturday, 10 November 2007 01:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
daThe author of Unlikely Utopia: the Surprising Triumph of Canadian Pluralism spoke here last night.
[...and I'll fill in the details later.]
[and I suck. I didn't get to this until today, Sunday the 18th, and I barely remember any of the talk's details.]
Michael Adams is an engaging speaker (as well as a good writer, judging by Fire and Ice.
The point to the talk was that pluralism has been successful in Canada in the second half of the 20th century in a very different way from in the US or Europe; and it has been surprisingly successful at integrating immigrants in important ways. Case in point: you might judge first-generation Canadian integration by their civic involvement- as a measure of how strongly people feel connected to their new communities.
Measuring foreign-born members of Parliament is interesting- because not only do they need to *want* to run for office, they need to successfully *win* office, and the statistics usually describe highly mixed-ethnicity MP ridings, so they're not winning solely among their own ethnicity of voters. One example was a Toronto riding with a Chinese-Canadian MP, where the majority ethnicity is Italian.
Anyhow: 13% of MPs are foreign born; first-generation Canadian; versus roughly 20% of the population being first-generation Canadian.
Or in the United States, where 4% of the House of Representatives are foreign-born, versus something like 11% of the population are foreign-born.
This review covers a small wedge of the talk's topics. I might've taken more complete notes, but I didn't. I hope to eventually read the book, and I can review it properly then. But don't hold your breath.
[...and I'll fill in the details later.]
[and I suck. I didn't get to this until today, Sunday the 18th, and I barely remember any of the talk's details.]
Michael Adams is an engaging speaker (as well as a good writer, judging by Fire and Ice.
The point to the talk was that pluralism has been successful in Canada in the second half of the 20th century in a very different way from in the US or Europe; and it has been surprisingly successful at integrating immigrants in important ways. Case in point: you might judge first-generation Canadian integration by their civic involvement- as a measure of how strongly people feel connected to their new communities.
Measuring foreign-born members of Parliament is interesting- because not only do they need to *want* to run for office, they need to successfully *win* office, and the statistics usually describe highly mixed-ethnicity MP ridings, so they're not winning solely among their own ethnicity of voters. One example was a Toronto riding with a Chinese-Canadian MP, where the majority ethnicity is Italian.
Anyhow: 13% of MPs are foreign born; first-generation Canadian; versus roughly 20% of the population being first-generation Canadian.
Or in the United States, where 4% of the House of Representatives are foreign-born, versus something like 11% of the population are foreign-born.
This review covers a small wedge of the talk's topics. I might've taken more complete notes, but I didn't. I hope to eventually read the book, and I can review it properly then. But don't hold your breath.
