"What happened to the Unix ideal of do one thing right?" What ideal would that be? I thought the Unix ideal was everybody and their grandmother re-inventing the wheel the way they wanted it. (red! No, green! With spinning rims!)
See, emacs can't use ctrl-c because that's overloaded, and it would take away dozens of possible combinations, don'tcha know, and you certainly can't use ctrl-g for that, because, well, it's Just Not Done...
Nah, emacs fulfils the philosophy of doing Everything. In Lisp, so it's hackable, but you should learn Lisp first. But, I'd rather learn Lisp than VB.
Printing it at home certainly has its benefits, but you don't get the spiral binding put in so it looks like a professional calendar. This is a professional joint, you see...
If I had a photo printer, I'm sure I'd do it that way too. :)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: Saturday, 17 December 2005 11:00 pm (UTC)Thanks, glad you liked it. :)
"What happened to the Unix ideal of do one thing right?" What ideal would that be? I thought the Unix ideal was everybody and their grandmother re-inventing the wheel the way they wanted it. (red! No, green! With spinning rims!)
See, emacs can't use ctrl-c because that's overloaded, and it would take away dozens of possible combinations, don'tcha know, and you certainly can't use ctrl-g for that, because, well, it's Just Not Done...
Nah, emacs fulfils the philosophy of doing Everything. In Lisp, so it's hackable, but you should learn Lisp first. But, I'd rather learn Lisp than VB.
Printing it at home certainly has its benefits, but you don't get the spiral binding put in so it looks like a professional calendar. This is a professional joint, you see...
If I had a photo printer, I'm sure I'd do it that way too. :)