da: (bit)
[personal profile] da
I'm going to rant about Windows just a bit.

Why it is that the Windows (XP) search facility is so awful? Did their UI testers hate them? Did they ultimately not care, because they were behind schedule?

I want all files on the disk that match the name "calendar". So I chose "Search" from the explorer toolbar.

So it says:

What do you want to search for?

Pictures, music or video
Documents (word processing, spreadsheet, etc)
All files and folders
Computers or people

[...and so on with other choices.]

To start with, a cheap shot: the grammar is wrong, and I don't even care about ending the sentence with a preposition. Given these choices, it should be "What do you want to search". If I search for all files, there will be 50,000 matches and I'll never find what I want. But I'm OK with that really.

I choose Documents, because I know I'm looking for .pdfs, probably even in "My Documents." It asks: "Last time it was modified:" with the choices of "in the last week" through "1 year ago" or "Don't Remember." You must choose. It must be within a year or "Don't Remember".

Sigh. I know what they meant, and I guess I'm OK with that, too. I pick "Don't remember" even though I do, and search, and... it can't find anything.

It gives me a long string of options for refining the search, quitting and making future searches faster, or not making future searches faster... which I ignore and hit the "Search" again from the explorer toolbar.

Which turns out to be a toggle, and it shows me "Other Places" instead which is apparently a code for "we don't know where you were when you started searching." No, please, take me to other places... (How about... Tahiti?)

But there's still text in the right-hand part of the window that says "To start your search, follow the instructions in the left pane". Which is totally inaccurate since the search is gone.

So I click the search toggle again and this time I choose "search all files", and it finds 12 filenames, in relatively short order, that is to say 20 seconds. And what do you know, they're in "Daniel\My Documents\".

So, what was wrong with the previous search? PDFs aren't documents? I have a corrupt database of filenames? I don't know.

Give me linux's command-line "locate calendar" (1 second) or mac's Spotlight (4 seconds, but it also searches file contents and helpfully prioritizes for most likely matches, which is usually accurate).

Because I'm a glutton for punishment, I was curious how long it would take XP to search file contents as well. 12 minutes. Then, I asked it to do the same thing again, to see if it cached it. "Unexpected error. Action could not be completed."

And it seems to not cache the results, unless you explicitly turn on search caching. Oooookay.

Rant: over. I feel better now. :)

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melted-snowball.livejournal.com
Maybe it's channeling Truman Capote (Other Voices, Other Rooms).

I wonder where the nearest Tahiti is? New Jersey is pretty far.

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dcseain.livejournal.com
I've been using Google Desktop in my Windows machines for years. It searches faster, and more accurately.

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uniquecrash5.livejournal.com
Of course a PDF file isn't a document. It's not a Microsoft file format, so it couldn't possibly be. ;)

I'm curious about Google Desktop myself, but most of the times I've seen it were times I was installing something utterly unrelated and I was asked if I'd like to install Google Desktop as well; my inherent distrust of any software so provided has led me to avoid it so far.

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] insaint.livejournal.com
I always ignore the "helpful" category options and search through all files.

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 05:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sulle-stelle.livejournal.com
Why in God's name are you using Windows, anyway???!! Just say NO!.... *shudder*

Reportedly, Vista has a more "spotlight-ish" search functionality ("oooh! it updates the results in realtime, as you type your query!...") which is a few years too late, but, whatever.

At work, where I am stuck with Windows, I have tried to search my Outlook inbox, and all searches fail. Always. No matter what I do.

I'm curious to see the improvements Leopard has in searching. Reportedly, it has improved customizability of the queries. What I"m hoping it has is an easy means to keyword-tag (groups of) files.

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catbear.livejournal.com
google_desktop++

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 07:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poeticalpanther.livejournal.com
I'm not sure I understand. I use XP, and the Search facility, when I click on "When was it modified?" it offers me "Specify Dates" with a couple of rollers to set the date range.

There are certainly better engines out there, but this particular complaint confuses me a bit. :)

Maybe it's a Pro/Home distinction? I've got the XP Pro...

Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 09:18 pm (UTC)
ckd: (cpu)
From: [personal profile] ckd
I use find, because with its Swiss Army Command Line I can get it to do just about anything I want. I haven't quite figured out how to effectively use mdfind, but that does look cool. (Command line Spotlight.)

(Incidentally, you can also use locate on a Mac, but you'd have to add the database build to crontab.)

December 2024

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Thursday, 25 December 2025 03:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios