I don't like Windows
Monday, 4 September 2006 11:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
daI'm going to rant about Windows just a bit.
Why it is that the Windows (XP) search facility is so awful? Did their UI testers hate them? Did they ultimately not care, because they were behind schedule?
I want all files on the disk that match the name "calendar". So I chose "Search" from the explorer toolbar.
So it says:
What do you want to search for?
Pictures, music or video
Documents (word processing, spreadsheet, etc)
All files and folders
Computers or people
[...and so on with other choices.]
To start with, a cheap shot: the grammar is wrong, and I don't even care about ending the sentence with a preposition. Given these choices, it should be "What do you want to search". If I search for all files, there will be 50,000 matches and I'll never find what I want. But I'm OK with that really.
I choose Documents, because I know I'm looking for .pdfs, probably even in "My Documents." It asks: "Last time it was modified:" with the choices of "in the last week" through "1 year ago" or "Don't Remember." You must choose. It must be within a year or "Don't Remember".
Sigh. I know what they meant, and I guess I'm OK with that, too. I pick "Don't remember" even though I do, and search, and... it can't find anything.
It gives me a long string of options for refining the search, quitting and making future searches faster, or not making future searches faster... which I ignore and hit the "Search" again from the explorer toolbar.
Which turns out to be a toggle, and it shows me "Other Places" instead which is apparently a code for "we don't know where you were when you started searching." No, please, take me to other places... (How about... Tahiti?)
But there's still text in the right-hand part of the window that says "To start your search, follow the instructions in the left pane". Which is totally inaccurate since the search is gone.
So I click the search toggle again and this time I choose "search all files", and it finds 12 filenames, in relatively short order, that is to say 20 seconds. And what do you know, they're in "Daniel\My Documents\".
So, what was wrong with the previous search? PDFs aren't documents? I have a corrupt database of filenames? I don't know.
Give me linux's command-line "locate calendar" (1 second) or mac's Spotlight (4 seconds, but it also searches file contents and helpfully prioritizes for most likely matches, which is usually accurate).
Because I'm a glutton for punishment, I was curious how long it would take XP to search file contents as well. 12 minutes. Then, I asked it to do the same thing again, to see if it cached it. "Unexpected error. Action could not be completed."
And it seems to not cache the results, unless you explicitly turn on search caching. Oooookay.
Rant: over. I feel better now. :)
Why it is that the Windows (XP) search facility is so awful? Did their UI testers hate them? Did they ultimately not care, because they were behind schedule?
I want all files on the disk that match the name "calendar". So I chose "Search" from the explorer toolbar.
So it says:
What do you want to search for?
Pictures, music or video
Documents (word processing, spreadsheet, etc)
All files and folders
Computers or people
[...and so on with other choices.]
To start with, a cheap shot: the grammar is wrong, and I don't even care about ending the sentence with a preposition. Given these choices, it should be "What do you want to search". If I search for all files, there will be 50,000 matches and I'll never find what I want. But I'm OK with that really.
I choose Documents, because I know I'm looking for .pdfs, probably even in "My Documents." It asks: "Last time it was modified:" with the choices of "in the last week" through "1 year ago" or "Don't Remember." You must choose. It must be within a year or "Don't Remember".
Sigh. I know what they meant, and I guess I'm OK with that, too. I pick "Don't remember" even though I do, and search, and... it can't find anything.
It gives me a long string of options for refining the search, quitting and making future searches faster, or not making future searches faster... which I ignore and hit the "Search" again from the explorer toolbar.
Which turns out to be a toggle, and it shows me "Other Places" instead which is apparently a code for "we don't know where you were when you started searching." No, please, take me to other places... (How about... Tahiti?)
But there's still text in the right-hand part of the window that says "To start your search, follow the instructions in the left pane". Which is totally inaccurate since the search is gone.
So I click the search toggle again and this time I choose "search all files", and it finds 12 filenames, in relatively short order, that is to say 20 seconds. And what do you know, they're in "Daniel\My Documents\".
So, what was wrong with the previous search? PDFs aren't documents? I have a corrupt database of filenames? I don't know.
Give me linux's command-line "locate calendar" (1 second) or mac's Spotlight (4 seconds, but it also searches file contents and helpfully prioritizes for most likely matches, which is usually accurate).
Because I'm a glutton for punishment, I was curious how long it would take XP to search file contents as well. 12 minutes. Then, I asked it to do the same thing again, to see if it cached it. "Unexpected error. Action could not be completed."
And it seems to not cache the results, unless you explicitly turn on search caching. Oooookay.
Rant: over. I feel better now. :)
no subject
Date: Monday, 4 September 2006 09:18 pm (UTC)(Incidentally, you can also use locate on a Mac, but you'd have to add the database build to crontab.)
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2006 02:44 am (UTC)I didn't have to add anything to any crontabs, either. :)
(v10.4.7)
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2006 04:53 am (UTC)