Last autumn,
melted_snowball and I looked at the Quakerism wikipedia page and sort of groaned. It was too historical, it overall left the taste of a bad museum piece, with not enough interpretation or content about modern Friends at all.
Well, I came back to look this last weekend, and some folks have been quite busy. It's much better now- it's got lots of modern content, it captures more of the diversity of Friends, and apparently there's a drive to make it a "featured article" through wikipedia's peer review process. Makes me happy.
( More betterer )
Well, I came back to look this last weekend, and some folks have been quite busy. It's much better now- it's got lots of modern content, it captures more of the diversity of Friends, and apparently there's a drive to make it a "featured article" through wikipedia's peer review process. Makes me happy.
( More betterer )