da: A smiling human with short hair, head tilted a bit to the right. It's black and white with a neutral background. You can't tell if the white in the hair is due to lighting, or maybe it's white hair! (Default)
[personal profile] da


I'm pleased with how all of these came out :)

[edit: though, I'm perplexed as to why the colours render slightly differently in Firefox and in iPhoto. They look slightly washed out here. Maybe iPhoto has a different gamma setting? How un-mac, if that's so.]

artsy 1

artsy 2

artsy 3, the laptop contingent

artsy 4

(deleted comment)

Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 04:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldgrover.livejournal.com
It is because it has me in it. I make everything look good :)

Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] da-lj.livejournal.com
Hm. mmmmaybe.

It is a good pic of you two, though.

If you like, I could show you the one with similar composition which I didn't post, where you're kind of making a big grimmace at your screen.

"I hate that fucking wall!"

Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldgrover.livejournal.com
Heh. Sure. Go for it :)

Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] da-lj.livejournal.com
Sent (to your lj address; if that's not a good address, let me know.)

It's funny to me that since this mac is a new OS for me, my workflow is less obvious to /not/ send a photo somewhere public, than to do so. :)

Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldgrover.livejournal.com
That worked fine :)

Heh. Nice picture.

Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] da-lj.livejournal.com
Yea- you look intent, yet smiling too. I like it too.

I'm surprised the lighting worked as well as it did, to be honest.

Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 01:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] earthling177.livejournal.com
The entire workflow (camera to mac to iphoto to screen and/or printer) is supposed to be completely color synchronized (ColorSync) so the output is as faithful as possible under the circumstances, given that the camera, the screen and the printer share only a tiny part of the color spectrum. I'm willing to bet that the browsers do not share that point of view, given that their objective in life is to try to bring everything down to a common denominator and make it possible to vaguely share stuff thru the web.

One thing you can check is System Preferences>Displays>Color and see what profile you are using. You can also choose Calibrate from there and see what is different about the screen -- you can even choose the gamma (1.8 is standard for Macs, 2.2 for TV/PCs) and choose the white point. I think it's possible to make the system adopt the same profile that browsers use, but in general I've had more luck printing stuff that is very much like the screen and the original picture by just using the mac standard.

December 2024

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Thursday, 17 July 2025 08:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios